From fiji at ayup.limey.net Wed Sep 19 07:20:16 2007 From: fiji at ayup.limey.net (Ben Bennett) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:20:16 -0400 Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20070919142016.GA22183@ayup.limey.net> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:31:52AM +1200, Mike van Bokhoven wrote: > Hi, > > Couple of points there - I'd say if Winamp and iTunes don't want to support > a currently implemented frame, there's not much point in trying to specify > another frame for them to ignore as well! Are you sure they don't use POPM? iTunes does not. Even worse... they don't store the rating in the tag at all. It is only stored in their iTunes "database" file. > I have no idea if they do or don't really, just seems silly not to use a > standardised frame for something like that. Additionally, repeated play > isn't necessary - all you have to do is set the rating byte to whatever > value you like, the play counter is optional, the way I read the spec. I'd > guess the way this frame is used is up to the app using it, the standard > doesn't specify much detail. Windows Media Player uses the POPM field to do it's stars. > While talking about new standard frames is interesting, in reality ID3 > seems quite static. The uptake of 2.4 does not seem to have been very > widespread... am I wrong there? The practical upshot of that is that > there's very little point in defining new frames, unfortunately. Would > software authors update their support to a 2.5 if there was one? iTunes supports 2.4 in a broken way. Taglib can read 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 frames, but can only write 2.4. But I agree with your point that us speccing a new frame is unlikely to get it well supported. I would rather issue a 2.4.1 version to clarify the spec on some frames and make the whole "frame length" issue blindingly clear so that anything writing 2.4.1 would get that right. It would also be nice to have a 2.3.1 version that just added UTF-8 support. -ben --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From kermit_blue at hotmail.com Wed Sep 19 05:20:54 2007 From: kermit_blue at hotmail.com (kermit blue) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:20:54 -0400 Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature In-Reply-To: <749F5067C7A94CF5A1E41079D47053B1@fluke> Message-ID: that's an interesting feature. but what i'm thinking of is something that would carry over into programs like itunes & winamp the same way that things like genre already do. also, i'm thinking of ratings that you yourself do as a one-time decision; the process you pointed to would take a lot of time to develop the ratings & only takes one factor (repetition of play) into account. thanks for the reply >From: "Mike van Bokhoven" >Reply-To: id3v2 at id3.org >To: >Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] requested feature >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:14:58 +1200 > >Hi, > >How about the Popularimeter frame? In the ID3v2.3 spec, see the section >"4.18. Popularimeter": > >The purpose of this frame is to specify how good an audio file is. Many >interesting applications could be found to this frame such as a playlist >that features better audiofiles more often than others or it could be used >to profile a person's taste and find other 'good' files by comparing >people's profiles. The frame is very simple. It contains the email address >to the user, one rating byte and a four byte play counter, intended to be >increased with one for every time the file is played. The email is a >terminated string. The rating is 1-255 where 1 is worst and 255 is best. 0 >is unknown. If no personal counter is wanted it may be omitted. When the >counter reaches all one's, one byte is inserted in front of the counter >thus making the counter eight bits bigger in the same away as the play >counter ("PCNT"). There may be more than one "POPM" frame in each tag, but >only one with the same email address. > > >Mike. > > >----- Original Message ----- From: "kermit blue" >To: >Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:11 AM >Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature > > >>maybe this isn't the right place for this but i'm giving it a shot. >> >>i would like to see song ratings included as one of the categories of >>information included in the ID3 tag. >>the various music library programs offer ratings systems, but don't store >>the information in the ID3 tag which would be much more practical. >> >>thanks, >>kermit >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Get the device you want, with the Hotmail? you love. >>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/mobilehotmail/default.mspx?WT.mc_ID=MobileHMTagline >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org > _________________________________________________________________ Get a FREE small business Web site and more from Microsoft? Office Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0930003811mrt/direct/01/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From id3v2 at northpb.com Wed Sep 19 08:42:19 2007 From: id3v2 at northpb.com (Dan O'Neill) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:42:19 -0700 Subject: [ID3 Dev] id3 updates re: itunes and frames in the wild Message-ID: <46F1435B.5070809@northpb.com> Ben Bennett just added some good information to id3.org about iTunes [1] and frames seen, but not include in the standard. [2] Thanks for the updates Ben! In the interest of getting more complete information about iTunes, can anyone help with the following question? 1. I am aware of the TCMP iTunes only frame, are there others? TCMP - iTunes compliation flag [3] 2. I'm aware of these COMM frames, but don't have documentation for all of them. iTunes overloads comment frames to add data for iTunes/iPod specific functionality. desc = iTunNORM - iTunes Normalization [4] desc = iTunSMPB - ? desc = iTunPGAP - ? desc = ITUNES_CDDB_IDS - ? 3. I'm believe that iTunes will write 2.4 tags even when writing in 2.3 format (TSOA, TSOT or TSOP) Can anyone confirm this behavior? Thanks, dano [1] http://id3.org/iTunes [2] http://id3.org/Developer_Information [3] http://id3.org/iTunes_Compilation_Flag [4] http://id3.org/iTunes_Normalization_settings --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From paul_t100 at fastmail.fm Thu Sep 20 04:39:25 2007 From: paul_t100 at fastmail.fm (Paul Taylor) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:39:25 +0100 Subject: [ID3 Dev] iTunes and Winamp only seem to recognise a value in the COMM frame as a comment if its short description is blank, Message-ID: <46F25BED.1060800@fastmail.fm> iTunes and Winamp only seem to recognise a value in the COMM frame as a comment if its short description is blank, am I right , and is this the case for most applications ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From paul_t100 at fastmail.fm Thu Sep 20 03:36:57 2007 From: paul_t100 at fastmail.fm (Paul Taylor) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:36:57 +0100 Subject: [ID3 Dev] id3 updates re: itunes and frames in the wild In-Reply-To: <20070919233951.GA8324@ayup.limey.net> References: <46F1435B.5070809@northpb.com> <46F17950.8030200@fastmail.fm> <20070919233951.GA8324@ayup.limey.net> Message-ID: <46F24D49.8000702@fastmail.fm> Ben Bennett wrote: > 3. I'm believe that iTunes will write 2.4 tags >>> even when writing in 2.3 format (TSOA, TSOT or TSOP) >>> Can anyone confirm this behavior? >>> >>> >> Yes it does, it also uses contractions of these fields for v2.2. it also >> has a field for Composer Sort and a field for Album Artist Sort >> >> Field v23/v24 v22 >> >> Title Sort TSOT TST >> Artist Sort TSOP TSP >> Album Sort TSOA TSA >> Album Artist Sort TSO2 TS2 >> Composer Sort TSOC TSC >> > > Cool! Does it actually honor these? Updated the wiki. > > Sorry not sure what you mean by 'honor' these. Also if you are interested in frames in the wild MusicBrainzPicard (and possibly other applications) use XSOT,XSOP and XSOA for sort fields in ID3v2.3 Also are you interested in the keys used within TXXX frames, Picard and Jaikoz both write various MusicBRainz info to these fields, full details at http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/PicardQt/TagMapping Also, i think last.fm write tags to support its music scrobbling service, but I dont know the details. Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From paul_t100 at fastmail.fm Wed Sep 19 12:32:32 2007 From: paul_t100 at fastmail.fm (Paul Taylor) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:32:32 +0100 Subject: [ID3 Dev] id3 updates re: itunes and frames in the wild In-Reply-To: <46F1435B.5070809@northpb.com> References: <46F1435B.5070809@northpb.com> Message-ID: <46F17950.8030200@fastmail.fm> Dan O'Neill wrote: > Ben Bennett just added some good information to id3.org about iTunes > [1] and frames seen, but not include in the standard. [2] > > Thanks for the updates Ben! > > In the interest of getting more complete information about iTunes, can > anyone help with the following question? 1. I am aware of the TCMP iTunes only frame, are there others? TCMP - iTunes compliation flag [3] In v2.2 its TCP > 3. I'm believe that iTunes will write 2.4 tags > even when writing in 2.3 format (TSOA, TSOT or TSOP) > Can anyone confirm this behavior? > Yes it does, it also uses contractions of these fields for v2.2. it also has a field for Composer Sort and a field for Album Artist Sort Field v23/v24 v22 Title Sort TSOT TST Artist Sort TSOP TSP Album Sort TSOA TSA Album Artist Sort TSO2 TS2 Composer Sort TSOC TSC > Thanks, > > dano > [1] http://id3.org/iTunes > [2] http://id3.org/Developer_Information > [3] http://id3.org/iTunes_Compilation_Flag > [4] http://id3.org/iTunes_Normalization_settings > Are these pages accessible from the wiki without searching, and it got me thinking are there loads of other pages there as well that I'm not aware of? Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From fiji at ayup.limey.net Wed Sep 19 16:39:51 2007 From: fiji at ayup.limey.net (Ben Bennett) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:39:51 -0400 Subject: [ID3 Dev] id3 updates re: itunes and frames in the wild In-Reply-To: <46F17950.8030200@fastmail.fm> References: <46F1435B.5070809@northpb.com> <46F17950.8030200@fastmail.fm> Message-ID: <20070919233951.GA8324@ayup.limey.net> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:32:32PM +0100, Paul Taylor wrote: > Dan O'Neill wrote: > >Ben Bennett just added some good information to id3.org about iTunes > >[1] and frames seen, but not include in the standard. [2] > > > >Thanks for the updates Ben! > > > >In the interest of getting more complete information about iTunes, can > >anyone help with the following question? > > 1. I am aware of the TCMP iTunes only frame, are there others? > TCMP - iTunes compliation flag [3] > > In v2.2 its TCP Interesting. Added to the wiki. > >3. I'm believe that iTunes will write 2.4 tags > > even when writing in 2.3 format (TSOA, TSOT or TSOP) > > Can anyone confirm this behavior? > > > Yes it does, it also uses contractions of these fields for v2.2. it also > has a field for Composer Sort and a field for Album Artist Sort > > Field v23/v24 v22 > > Title Sort TSOT TST > Artist Sort TSOP TSP > Album Sort TSOA TSA > Album Artist Sort TSO2 TS2 > Composer Sort TSOC TSC Cool! Does it actually honor these? Updated the wiki. > >[1] http://id3.org/iTunes > >[2] http://id3.org/Developer_Information > >[3] http://id3.org/iTunes_Compilation_Flag > >[4] http://id3.org/iTunes_Normalization_settings > > > Are these pages accessible from the wiki without searching, and it got Yes, but I added them today... Developer info is off the sidebar, and from there you can get to the others. > me thinking are there loads of other pages there as well that I'm not > aware of? Possibly ;-) http://id3.org/RecentChanges -- Shows what's going on. -ben --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From mike at ambientdesign.com Wed Sep 19 05:14:58 2007 From: mike at ambientdesign.com (Mike van Bokhoven) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:14:58 +1200 Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <749F5067C7A94CF5A1E41079D47053B1@fluke> Hi, How about the Popularimeter frame? In the ID3v2.3 spec, see the section "4.18. Popularimeter": The purpose of this frame is to specify how good an audio file is. Many interesting applications could be found to this frame such as a playlist that features better audiofiles more often than others or it could be used to profile a person's taste and find other 'good' files by comparing people's profiles. The frame is very simple. It contains the email address to the user, one rating byte and a four byte play counter, intended to be increased with one for every time the file is played. The email is a terminated string. The rating is 1-255 where 1 is worst and 255 is best. 0 is unknown. If no personal counter is wanted it may be omitted. When the counter reaches all one's, one byte is inserted in front of the counter thus making the counter eight bits bigger in the same away as the play counter ("PCNT"). There may be more than one "POPM" frame in each tag, but only one with the same email address. Mike. ----- Original Message ----- From: "kermit blue" To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:11 AM Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature > maybe this isn't the right place for this but i'm giving it a shot. > > i would like to see song ratings included as one of the categories of > information included in the ID3 tag. > the various music library programs offer ratings systems, but don't store > the information in the ID3 tag which would be much more practical. > > thanks, > kermit > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get the device you want, with the Hotmail? you love. > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/mobilehotmail/default.mspx?WT.mc_ID=MobileHMTagline > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org > For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From kermit_blue at hotmail.com Wed Sep 19 07:39:03 2007 From: kermit_blue at hotmail.com (kermit blue) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:39:03 -0400 Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature In-Reply-To: Message-ID: i'm an outsider to the field, but yes i read that as well about 2.4. that was why i wasn't sure if this list was the right place to ask about this. i don't know the difficulty for adopting changes, but this would be a good change to adopt. >From: "Mike van Bokhoven" >Reply-To: id3v2 at id3.org >To: >Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] requested feature >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:31:52 +1200 > >Hi, > >Couple of points there - I'd say if Winamp and iTunes don't want to support >a currently implemented frame, there's not much point in trying to specify >another frame for them to ignore as well! Are you sure they don't use POPM? >I have no idea if they do or don't really, just seems silly not to use a >standardised frame for something like that. Additionally, repeated play >isn't necessary - all you have to do is set the rating byte to whatever >value you like, the play counter is optional, the way I read the spec. I'd >guess the way this frame is used is up to the app using it, the standard >doesn't specify much detail. > >While talking about new standard frames is interesting, in reality ID3 >seems quite static. The uptake of 2.4 does not seem to have been very >widespread... am I wrong there? The practical upshot of that is that >there's very little point in defining new frames, unfortunately. Would >software authors update their support to a 2.5 if there was one? > >Mike. > > > >----- Original Message ----- From: "kermit blue" >To: >Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:20 AM >Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] requested feature > > >>that's an interesting feature. >>but what i'm thinking of is something that would carry over into programs >>like itunes & winamp the same way that things like genre already do. >>also, i'm thinking of ratings that you yourself do as a one-time decision; >>the process you pointed to would take a lot of time to develop the ratings >>& only takes one factor (repetition of play) into account. >> >>thanks for the reply >> >> >>>From: "Mike van Bokhoven" >>>Reply-To: id3v2 at id3.org >>>To: >>>Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] requested feature >>>Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:14:58 +1200 >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>How about the Popularimeter frame? In the ID3v2.3 spec, see the section >>>"4.18. Popularimeter": >>> >>>The purpose of this frame is to specify how good an audio file is. Many >>>interesting applications could be found to this frame such as a playlist >>>that features better audiofiles more often than others or it could be >>>used to profile a person's taste and find other 'good' files by comparing >>>people's profiles. The frame is very simple. It contains the email >>>address to the user, one rating byte and a four byte play counter, >>>intended to be increased with one for every time the file is played. The >>>email is a terminated string. The rating is 1-255 where 1 is worst and >>>255 is best. 0 is unknown. If no personal counter is wanted it may be >>>omitted. When the counter reaches all one's, one byte is inserted in >>>front of the counter thus making the counter eight bits bigger in the >>>same away as the play counter ("PCNT"). There may be more than one "POPM" >>>frame in each tag, but only one with the same email address. >>> >>> >>>Mike. >>> >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "kermit blue" >>> >>>To: >>>Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:11 AM >>>Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature >>> >>> >>>>maybe this isn't the right place for this but i'm giving it a shot. >>>> >>>>i would like to see song ratings included as one of the categories of >>>>information included in the ID3 tag. >>>>the various music library programs offer ratings systems, but don't >>>>store the information in the ID3 tag which would be much more practical. >>>> >>>>thanks, >>>>kermit >>>> >>>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>>Get the device you want, with the Hotmail? you love. >>>>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/mobilehotmail/default.mspx?WT.mc_ID=MobileHMTagline >>>> >>>> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org >>> >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >>>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org >>> >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Get a FREE small business Web site and more from Microsoft? Office Live! >>http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0930003811mrt/direct/01/ >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org > _________________________________________________________________ Get a FREE small business Web site and more from Microsoft? Office Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0930003811mrt/direct/01/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From kermit_blue at hotmail.com Wed Sep 19 05:11:12 2007 From: kermit_blue at hotmail.com (kermit blue) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:11:12 -0400 Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature Message-ID: maybe this isn't the right place for this but i'm giving it a shot. i would like to see song ratings included as one of the categories of information included in the ID3 tag. the various music library programs offer ratings systems, but don't store the information in the ID3 tag which would be much more practical. thanks, kermit _________________________________________________________________ Get the device you want, with the Hotmail? you love. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/mobilehotmail/default.mspx?WT.mc_ID=MobileHMTagline --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From peter at phx.co.za Fri Sep 14 00:21:46 2007 From: peter at phx.co.za (Peter Dzomlija) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:21:46 +0200 Subject: [ID3 Dev] Id3v2 Icon for Vista Message-ID: <000001c7f69f$e9121da0$bb3658e0$@co.za> The icons provided on ID3.org are a little out of date, so I created a Vista-compliant ID3v2 icon, based on the original logo in developer information. File Attached. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ID3v2.ico Type: image/x-icon Size: 50754 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From mike at ambientdesign.com Wed Sep 19 05:31:52 2007 From: mike at ambientdesign.com (Mike van Bokhoven) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:31:52 +1200 Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Couple of points there - I'd say if Winamp and iTunes don't want to support a currently implemented frame, there's not much point in trying to specify another frame for them to ignore as well! Are you sure they don't use POPM? I have no idea if they do or don't really, just seems silly not to use a standardised frame for something like that. Additionally, repeated play isn't necessary - all you have to do is set the rating byte to whatever value you like, the play counter is optional, the way I read the spec. I'd guess the way this frame is used is up to the app using it, the standard doesn't specify much detail. While talking about new standard frames is interesting, in reality ID3 seems quite static. The uptake of 2.4 does not seem to have been very widespread... am I wrong there? The practical upshot of that is that there's very little point in defining new frames, unfortunately. Would software authors update their support to a 2.5 if there was one? Mike. ----- Original Message ----- From: "kermit blue" To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:20 AM Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] requested feature > that's an interesting feature. > but what i'm thinking of is something that would carry over into programs > like itunes & winamp the same way that things like genre already do. > also, i'm thinking of ratings that you yourself do as a one-time decision; > the process you pointed to would take a lot of time to develop the ratings > & only takes one factor (repetition of play) into account. > > thanks for the reply > > >>From: "Mike van Bokhoven" >>Reply-To: id3v2 at id3.org >>To: >>Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] requested feature >>Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:14:58 +1200 >> >>Hi, >> >>How about the Popularimeter frame? In the ID3v2.3 spec, see the section >>"4.18. Popularimeter": >> >>The purpose of this frame is to specify how good an audio file is. Many >>interesting applications could be found to this frame such as a playlist >>that features better audiofiles more often than others or it could be used >>to profile a person's taste and find other 'good' files by comparing >>people's profiles. The frame is very simple. It contains the email address >>to the user, one rating byte and a four byte play counter, intended to be >>increased with one for every time the file is played. The email is a >>terminated string. The rating is 1-255 where 1 is worst and 255 is best. 0 >>is unknown. If no personal counter is wanted it may be omitted. When the >>counter reaches all one's, one byte is inserted in front of the counter >>thus making the counter eight bits bigger in the same away as the play >>counter ("PCNT"). There may be more than one "POPM" frame in each tag, but >>only one with the same email address. >> >> >>Mike. >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "kermit blue" >>To: >>Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:11 AM >>Subject: [ID3 Dev] requested feature >> >> >>>maybe this isn't the right place for this but i'm giving it a shot. >>> >>>i would like to see song ratings included as one of the categories of >>>information included in the ID3 tag. >>>the various music library programs offer ratings systems, but don't store >>>the information in the ID3 tag which would be much more practical. >>> >>>thanks, >>>kermit >>> >>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>Get the device you want, with the Hotmail? you love. >>>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/mobilehotmail/default.mspx?WT.mc_ID=MobileHMTagline >>> >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >>>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get a FREE small business Web site and more from Microsoft? Office Live! > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0930003811mrt/direct/01/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org > For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org From dalepres at msn.com Sun Sep 2 09:02:13 2007 From: dalepres at msn.com (Dale Preston) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:02:13 -0500 Subject: [ID3 Dev] iTunes COM Frame question Message-ID: In the latest versions of iTunes, I have run across another questionable COM frame issue in my code. My code takes the frame bytes after the language descriptor and parses the null terminated strings. This has worked for some time so, even though I cannot say I remember absolutely, I have to assume this is a change in how iTunes creates the COM frame. Now, instead of returning an array of two strings (description and comment), my parser is returning three strings (description, comment, and an empty string) because the frame bytes end in two null bytes instead of one. The questionable frame is using ISO-8859 encoding (0 encoding byte). I am trying to decide if my code is flawed and needs to be fixed somewhere to handle this scenario as a valid frame or if this frame is flawed (I think this is the case) and I need to handle it as a flaw - basically throw away the third string in the array and keep on moving. Thanks for any feedback on this, Dale -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: