[ID3 Dev] Moving forward on Chapter Frames

Pyt py.thoulon at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 22:27:28 PST 2005

I would vote for the addendum. I believe it is easier from an implementation
standpoint to authorize Chapter frames in existing ID3v2.3/4 implementations
(skipping them properly would be enough) than to add support for a new

Moreover, people who will be adding these frames to files will know what
they want to do with them, and will most likely test the programs that they
want to use them with.

Those bothered by the frames can always use a tolerant tag editor (I use
ID3-TagIt - http://www.id3-tagit.de) to remove them.


On 11/29/05, Michal Vician <id3v2 at audiott.com> wrote:
> Now, what way would YOU choose ("addendum" <- or -> "new version") ???
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.id3.org/pipermail/id3v2/attachments/20051130/7e6e59d4/attachment.html>

More information about the ID3v2 mailing list