[ID3 Dev] Genre suggestion

[Pat Furrie]

Brian,

While utilities might come into existance to disable to flag, so what?  The 
lock on the front door of my house is easily foiled by learning how to make 
a use a bump key from YouTube, but I still lock the door.  Do you?  
Probably.

And is it censorship?  Again, so what if it is?  I don't tell the kids what 
my wife and I do in the bedroom.  Censorship?  So what.  Part of being a 
parent is making choices about what a kid is exposed to at a certain age.  
For mine, they get differing levels of access based on their ability to deal 
with it.  You can call it censorship, I'll call it limiting.

We're just looking for tools to help us set up limiting for our kids.  I'm 
not going to stop trying just because some kids might try to get around it.  
Others aren't.  Even if you disagree, why would you care if someone tried, 
or that the tools were made to exist in order to make that attempt?

Don't censor the effort.

Pat


>From: Brian Mearns <bmearns at coe.neu.edu>
>Reply-To: id3v2 at id3.org
>To: id3v2 at id3.org
>Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] Genre suggestion
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:25:35 -0400
>
> >Tim isn't looking for why it won't work, he's looking
> > for ways to make it work.
>
>Spoken like a true manager.
>
>Personally, I have minor objections to this as a matter of principle; it's 
>a minor form of censorship, though granted it's no worse than the V-chip 
>and similar technologies. But sheltering your kids from the world isn't 
>protecting them. Even if you prevent them from playing certain songs 
>because of language of "adult-themes", they're still going to be exposed to 
>it else where; on tv, in movies, from their friends, siblings, class-mates, 
>&c. The important thing is to teach your kids the difference between what 
>they see or hear, and what's appropriate for them to say or do. And no 
>amount of sheltering will make up for good parenting. Now I know that 
>sounds very high and mighty, and I'm not trying to accuse anyone of being a 
>bad parent; I understand there's a lot of scary stuff out there and we want 
>to protect our kids from it. But like I said, they're going to be exposed 
>to it one way or another, and hiding it from them, not addressing the real 
>issue, is only going to make it harder to cope with when they finally are.
>
>Alright, so that was less ID3 and more rant. Come down to it, like Tom 
>said, you can't possibly prevent someone from editing the file they've 
>downloaded. If this system really did take off, it wouldn't take more than 
>a few days before download.com is filled with freeware apps to disable to 
>flag, and blogs all over the web have instructions on how to do it in note 
>pad.
>
>-Brian Mearns
>
>Pat Furrie wrote:
>>Tom,
>>
>>Now, I don't know if Tim's suggestion is workable.  But he does bring up a 
>>problem he's at least giving some thought to solving, and I'm certain 
>>other people have had this as a problem with which to deal.  It's the sort 
>>of thing that brought about the ratings codes in movies (quite some time 
>>ago) and ratings on TV (more recently).  I've got kids of my own who I 
>>want to have some way of helping distinguish which music is appropriate.
>>
>>You've pointed out a couple of challenges.  Perhaps you could provide some 
>>constructive analysis.  Devil's advocate is too easy; anyone can do that.  
>>But as they say, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the 
>>problem.  Tim isn't looking for why it won't work, he's looking for ways 
>>to make it work.
>>
>>Tim: I'd like to see a set of method with more granularity than just 
>>"adult" or not.  "Adult" is a bit slippery, and is defined differently by 
>>different people.  However, the existance of certain key words and 
>>concepts are more objective.  You might want to look at how TV has done 
>>ratings, and model it after that.  This way any "adult content" tag 
>>methodology could leverage the methods already adopted, and be more 
>>universal across media types (meaning, not just audio files).
>>
>>We could nay-say and do nothing, or we can get off our butts and do 
>>something.  Even if something doesn't work, I'd rather have tried to make 
>>it work than not.
>>
>>Fail fast, succeed sooner.
>>
>>Pat
>>
>>
>>>From: "Tom Sorensen" <tsorensen at gmail.com>
>>>Reply-To: id3v2 at id3.org
>>>To: id3v2 at id3.org
>>>Subject: Re: [ID3 Dev] Genre suggestion
>>>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:20:40 -0400
>>>
>>>If you want a new Genre, just make one. There is no list of
>>>pre-defined genres for ID3v2. You'd then have to modify whatever
>>>player to not play any music that belonged in that genre (and see
>>>below for the issues with that).
>>>
>>>But that's not what you really want. You want a flag that a music
>>>player would have to check before playing (or, since you seem
>>>concerned about the title, before even displaying). Certainly
>>>possible; there are other similar flags in the ID3v2 spec currently.
>>>
>>>I'll go ahead and object to it as pointless though. Since:
>>>
>>>A) nobody implements anything like this in current players (software
>>>or hardware), and it would be 3-5 years before that would change (and
>>>that's being optimistic; more likely it would never be implemented.
>>>ID3v2.4 is 5 years old now and still has very low uptake),
>>>
>>>B) it would be completely trivial to bypass and/or disable anyway
>>>since you cannot prevent someone from changing the tag (or removing it
>>>entirely).
>>>
>>>Tom Sorensen
>>>
>>>On 9/15/06, Tim Reinarts <tim_reinarts at soniqcast.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Do you have any provisions in the latest spec for adding an "adult 
>>>>content"
>>>>genre category?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I would propose that such a tag would allow parents to control the 
>>>>content
>>>>being used by their children.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Media player manufacturers can then implement a feature that allows 
>>>>parents
>>>>to prevent the player from accessing files with an Adult Content genre.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It concerns me that some of the most popular content on many sites like
>>>>MTV's URGE are songs with explicit titles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>Tim Reinarts
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: id3v2-unsubscribe at id3.org
For additional commands, e-mail: id3v2-help at id3.org